Pages

Friday, February 24, 2012

MODNEX INTEL/KATSURA WORLDWIDE: "HOW SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY'S ADMINISTRATION SCREWED UP MY GPA AND LIFE"


There are two parts to this.  First, an examination of the events caused which caused a no contest misdemeanor in CA.  Second, I'll provide an examination of SDSU's administrative incompetence and patently "unscientific" and horrifying grading policy relative to 'W' or 'I' grades.

The "Misdemeanor"

In 1997, a woman from SDSU's Loan Collections Office, named Ms. 'H' (we'll call her this although it is not her real name), called me in Santa Barbara stating that I owed SDSU $500 for a short-term emergency loan provided by the university.  Having no idea why I hadn't been able to gain appropriate and gainful employment since leaving their university, I had been subjected to unusual and bizarre circumstances in both Honolulu and CA, including poverty. 

Receiving Ms. 'H's collections call didn't make matters better.  I had been working part-time and earning minimum wages in "boiler room" telemarketing jobs, despite having tested at 71 WPM (no errors) at the local employment agencies and having run a word processing department on a full-time basis.  I was also a double major graduate from UCSB and had earned straight 'A' grades from SDSU in my core research coursework, as well.  In addition, I was also a past president of political science associations (at both the university level and community college level), a college tennis player, and had worked extensively wth youth in summer parks and recreation and t-ball as well.  (I discovered, 14 years later, that these challenges were due to SDSU's incompetent administrative policy on 'W' and 'I' grades which misguidedly lowered my GPA from 3.93 to approximately 2.17.  Businesses and schools applied to thought I was falsifying my GPA and the matter "snowballed" out of control.)

Since I was in such a terrible position and uncertain why, I decided to go back to school at my alma mater, UCSB, to pursue an M.A./Ph.D.  It was a good way to escape the social chaos and madness I was subjected to by the lumpen proletariat and criminal elements and I could get a consistent diet of nutritious intake, as well.  I made a deal with Hegman that I would pay her half the amount owed if she and SDSU would release my academic transcripts and have them sent to UCSB by the graduate division's deadline.  She was fully informed of my desperate circumstances and I sent her step-by-step instructions and deadline dates, along with a payment for $250, as well.  Everything was sent to her via certified-signature return receipt.

I skipped meals and scratched and clawed my way to paying for all of UCSB's admissions fees, postal fees, and rounded up all my letters of recommendations, etc., etc.  Nothing could go wrong.  Everything was set and I had a chance to reconnect with my alma mater and escape all the madness.

The transcripts never arrived and I missed the deadline.  I was disqualified from consideration.  I had been "bait and switched."

I  called SDSU's Chancellor's office and started from the top.  The lady who took my call told me that Ms. 'H' denied any agreement with me relative to sending my transcripts to UCSB.  I flipped out, blew a fuse and verbally abused the school.

In light of the circumstances, I would say that my behavior was that of a "reasonable man," frankly, and that SDSU's behavior was that of irresponsible misconduct, both relative to Ms. 'H's perilous behavior placing SDSU at risk and for their administrative incompetence relative to misrepresenting my GPA.

I earned a nolo contendere misdemeanor and community service at the Santa Barbara Boys and Girls club.  I also had to attend anger management (can you imagine?) counseling sessions, as well.  The court ordered 200 hours of community service and I gave them 220, since I was enjoying it.  All court requirements were met and the record has been available for expungement since about 2001.

Here's the kicker, however.  At the time of the proceedings, the court could not hold Ms. 'H' responsible for her "bait and switch" maneuver and her tactic didn't appear to have anything other than a collections interest in mind.  She certainly would not incriminate herself.  (Subsequently, the culprit, Ms. 'H', got off "scott free," to put it mildly.)  The court had no motive for why she would have resort to this type of behavior, even when considering her position as a loan collector.  It certainly didn't make sense that she would subject SDSU to such a perilous maneuver for a mere $250.  She had no bonus incentive or concerns about job security since she was a government employee and SEIU member.  So, why was the $250 so important?  The answer:  It wasn't.  She had an alterior motive for pulling this dangerous stunt that, if it were another person she did this to, would have put SDSU's campus and her fellow employees at great risk.  SDSU had just had a student shoot and kill a Ph.D. on their campus, as well, making 'H's action even more difficult to comprehend.

As it turns out, during my final semester at SDSU, my financial aid had been screwed up by the Office of Financial Aid, rendering me penniless and forcing me to withdraw from all my courses and causing all the semester's worth of coursework to go into the dreaded 'W' or 'I' status.  It also forced me to take out the infamous emergency student loan, as well, even though it was SDSU's error.  I demanded a full and thorough investigation by the Ombudsman's Office into the matter and got it.  The Ombudsman's Office raked them up and down, enough so that, apparently they "bore a grudge."

We had forgotten a very significant fact at the proceedings:  The Office of Financial Aid was also doubling as the Loan Collections Office.  Ms. 'H' was a member of the same office which I put under extreme scrutiny for screwing up my financial aid during my final semester.  The "missing motive" for Ms. 'H's pulling this stunt is now solved.  She didn't pull such a perilous stunt for the paltry $250.  She didn't do this for a bonus incentive.  She bore a long standing personal grudge for being investigated.  She came looking for trouble when she found me in Santa Barbara.  Ms. 'H' wasn't "just doing her job," she was a "predator" seeking to "exact revenge."

In short, Ms. 'H' was and is guilty of criminal contempt of court:  She lied to the authorities.  But, what would you expect from a "loan collector" backed by the the equally contemptuous SEIU?  While in support of job security and the "American Dream" for the "average working American," most certainly this bizarre and contemptuous behavior was not only unlawful, it was unforgiveable, as well, by any measure of standards of social decency.

Given SDSU's administrative incompetence, relative to screwing up my GPA, and Ms. 'H's unlawful misconduct, I stand innocent with the full understanding that my actions were those of a "reasonable man."


The Horrifying Impact of SDSU's Administrative Policy on 'W' and 'I' Grading

Relative to SDSU's severly misguided administrative policy of averaging in 'W' and/or 'I' grades into overall GPA, I think I owe you all an explanation of what occurred.

I was forced to withdraw from my 4 courses my final semester at SDSU as a result of their administrative screwup of my financial aid!  the four 'W'/'I' courses were later made into 'F's and averaged into my overall GPA reducing it from 3.93 to 2.17 or thereabouts.  The problem is that 'W'/'I' grades cannot represent academic performance since no inventory (test) is taken to determine the quality of the student's performance or competency in the overall coursework. In short, a student's peformance cannot be measured if they simply aren't there!  Subsequently, 'W'/'I' grades converted into 'F' grade points cannot be averaged into overall GPA where academic performance IS being measured/represented and students are present and actually inventoried by examination. In short, statistically, they're mixing "apples and oranges" and producing an "invalid" statistic or GPA.  The idea of assigning grade points is to represent a student's academic competency and performance, short and simple.  First, if the student is not there and has not been inventoried by examination to assign a grade point level to their performance, administration cannot simply "invent" a grade point to represent the student's performance as a replacement.  Second, administration cannot simply take the invented grade point and then average it into the rest of the overall GPA because, unlike the invented grade point, the overall GPA is a measurement of actual student performance where the student was present and inventoried by examination.  Again, this is mixing apples and oranges producing an "invalid" statistical GPA.  Make sense?

SDSU's GPA calculation, when averaging in such "invalid" grades and grade points, is patently "unscientific" and produces an invalid/skewed statistic/GPA.   My REAL GPA is 3.93 on a 4.0 scale.  I was citing my real/true graduate-level GPA on my resume and employment applications, since it is scientifically correct and accurate.  Apparently, CSU was reporting it tragically lower and statistically skewed.

In addition to the foregoing, I anticipate that SDSU/Cal State/State of California, will also likely employ an affirmative defense/evasive defense that they are statistically extrapolating a grade point out of an incomplete or withdrawn course and that, therefore, this is the employment of acceptable scientific method.

Good try, Cal State /SDSU/ State of California.  Here's why:

Let's take a language course in intro Japanese language.  The course is often composed of a series of separate and distinct components which require the student to employ separate and distinct abilities at different points in the course.

The course may have four examinations/inventories.  The first tests the student's ability to memorize katakana/kanji characters.  The second exam tests the student's ability to formulate strings of kanji in to sentences and sentence structure.  The third exam tests the student's ability in speech and pronunciation.  The final exam tests the student's ability to incorporate everything into appropriate discourse and writing at a basic level of communication.

As you can see, if a given Japanese language student takes only half the course and withdraws (for whatever reason), and we are left with two 'A' grade exams, we cannot extrapolate this out to the remaining two examinations because the student has not demonstrated mastery of speech and pronunciation, nor have they demonstrated that they are capable of "putting it all together" for basic writing and speaking communications.  They only demonstrated that they mastered the memorization of characters and formulated basic sentences, far from the mastery of basic writing and linguistic communications mastery of Japanese.

In short, if we were to statistically extrapolate the first two exams, 'A' grades, to the remaining two exam, we would not be measuring the student's competency in the overall coursework by any stretch of the imagination.  The grade, an 'A,' would be statistically invalid (does not measure/represent what is intended to be measured/represented) as a result, since it does not measure the student's performance/competency accurately, nor does it measure anything at all but "thin air" relative to the third and fourth examinations.

Clearly, the employment of statistical extrapolation is methodologically flawed when converting 'W'/'I' grades into grade points, and cannot be regarded as legitimate scientific method.  A 'false' 'A' grade or 4.0 (on a 0.0 to 4.0 scale) would be produced and averaged into the overall GPA, violently skewing the overall GPA upward.

Conversely, when a student fares poorly in the first two examinations, and receives 'C' or 'D' grades, we cannot employ statistical extrapolation, as well, should the student withdraw from the course (again, for whatever reason).  The same foregoing issues of statistical validity apply, and we cannot simply extrapolate their grades out to a final course grade of 'C' or 'D' which would violently skew their overall GPA downward and tragically misrepresent the student's academic capabilities.

While "extrapolation" sounds like it is a “valid and reliable” scientific method or an "O.K." or "acceptable" way of going about administration, it is clearly not "O.K." nor is it "acceptable."  It is patently misleading, an amazingly poor method of inventory, and predicated upon "fantasy" and the "imagination" rather than upon stout empirical observation, measurement and data gathering.  Not only is the method “invalid” in measuring student performance, it is “unreliable,” as well, since not all courses are structured the same.

Finally, relative to administrative policy, students could simply take a course, get 'A' grades in their first two or three exams in the course, and simply not show up for the remainder of the course and earn an 'A' grade for the overall course based upon extrapolation! Despite such students being "clueless" as to the content of the remaining half or quarter of the course, the administration would be obligated to honor such students with an 'A' grade for the overall coursework and represent them as "fully competent" of the coursework.  No, statistical extrapolation is not an acceptable affirmative defense in this matter.

Ultimately, SDSU's corruption of my GPA has produced a “Continuing Nuisance” (legal term) whose cause of action should not be subject to a statute of limitations. (I'm also investigating the fundamental integrity and jurisprudential competency of the Trial Lawyers Association and judiciary in CA, relative to the statute of limitations in CA.)

San Diego State University may have been caught intentionally converting my academic achievement there into a "continuing nuisance" (legal term) which has the effect, via the process of translation, of a "chronic, disabling and potentially lethal dis-ease". . . which steals financially, emotionally and physiologially through the unscientific and illegitimate administrative corruption and impostering of my GPA from 3.93 to 2.17 (or thereabouts) per the article in my Facebook Notes section . . .  The effect of the erroneous GPA is "theft," theft of opportunity for earnings, theft of reputation and replacing my person with an imposterous character (the individual their GPA represents me with was and is clearly "not me") and clearly I have been deprived of a litany of constitutional rights and civil liberties as a result of this ongoing mischaracterization.

www.facebook.com/gokatsura2016
www.myspace.com/gokatsura2016
www.myspace.com/kenkatsura

Sunday, February 19, 2012

MODNEX INTEL/KATSURA WORLDWIDE: KATSURA, "U.S. BOOMERS LYING IN GEN DEFINITIONS"

MODNEX INTEL/KATSURA WORLDWIDE . . .

. . . "DIVISION OF SOCIOECONOMICS AND POPULATION STUDIES" . . .

. . . AND "DIVISION OF ENTERTAINMENT AND POPULAR CULTURE" . . .

. . . REPORTS . . . IN A "BREAKING NEWS ALERT" . . .

. . . THAT . . . "RUMORS CIRCULATING" . . .

... . . . THAT TERM "BABY BOOMER" . . .

. . . IS AN ILLEGITIMATE "DEFINITIONAL CONSPIRACY" . . .

. . . BY BABY BOOMER GENERATION TO ARTIFICIALLY INCREASE ITS VOTING AND POLITICAL POWER . . .

. . . KATSURA RESPONDED THAT "THIS IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT" . . .

. . . RUMORS CONTINUE THAT MANY OF THE GENERATIONAL CHALLENGES THAT THE 80S GENERATION IS HAVING IS DUE TO THE WOMEN IN THEIR GENERATION WHO HAVE "SOLD OUT ON THE 80S GENERATION" AS A RESULT OF MARRYING "OLDER HUSBANDS" . . .

KATSURA RESPONDED TO THIS BY STATING THAT HE DOESN'T KNOW YET IF THIS IS CORRECT, BUT STATED THAT WITH REGARD TO "GENERATIONAL CONSPIRACY" RELATIVE TO "DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIOLOGICAL DEFINITION OF BOTH 'BABY BOOMER' AND 'SENIOR'" . . . THAT THERE IS A MAMMOTH DEFINTIONAL CONSPIRACY WHICH HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR THE PAST 19 YEARS IN THE UNITED STATES . . .

KATSURA STATED:

"A 50 YEAR OLD 'SENIOR'? (LOL) C'MON, GIMME A BREAK! THAT'S JUST COMMON SENSE THAT A 50-SOMETHING ISN'T A TRULY OLD PERSON! MAYBE A 60-YEAR OLD, BUT NOT A 50 YEAR OLD. THAT'S JUST COMMON SENSE, PEOPLE . . .

THE DEMOGRAPHIC, SOCIOLOGY AND PUBLISHING INDUSTRY'S DEFINTION OF 'SENIOR' IS CLEARLY A BALDFACED LIE, HAVING NO LEGITIMACY WHATSOEVER . . .

WOMEN WHO HAVE MARRIED OLDER MEN OFTEN FIND IT CONVENIENT TO REGARD THEMSELVES AS 'SENIORS' OR 'BABY BOOMERS' . . . BECAUSE THEIR HUSBANDS ARE SO MUCH OLDER . . . BUT, THIS IS JUST A BALDFACED LIE, FOLKS . . . AND THIS MUST BE REVERSED TO REFLECT THE TRUTH . . . SO AMERICANS CAN MOVE AHEAD . . . AND A NEW GENERATION CAN RIGHTLY TAKE ITS PLACE IN SHARING A GREATER LEVEL OF AUTHORITY . . . AS IT WAS PREPARED TO DO . . . AT LEAST 5 YEARS AGO . . .

THIS GENERATIONAL CONSPIRACY MUST BE ENDED . . . FOR OUR NATION TO GET BACK TO A MORE NORMAL DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE TIMELINE . . .

. . . 80S PEOPLE . . . ARE MORE CLOSELY ALIGNED WITH 'GENERATION JONES' . . . EVEN STILL . . . ARE NOT FULLY 'GENERATIONAL JONES' . . . AS WE DO HAVE OUR GENERATIONAL CROSSOVERS AND DIFFERENCES, ALIKE . . ."

Thursday, February 16, 2012

MODNEX INTEL/KATSURA WORLDWIDE: KATSURA, "ECON FAILING; MAY IMPLODE OVER 2012"

MODNEX INTEL/KATSURA WORLDWIDE . . .

. . . "DIVISION OF SOCIOECONOMICS" . . .

. . . REPORTS . . . IN A "BREAKING NEWS ALERT" . . .

. . . THAT KATSURA STATED, MOMENTS AGO . . .

. . . AFTER REVIEWING CURRENT ECONOMIC DATA . . .

... . . . THAT "THE ECONOMIC DATA IS BEING MISINTERPRETED AND ANALYSIS IS MISLEADING . . .

. . . GIVEN THE STUDENT LOAN CRISIS . . . AND CONTINUED BEHAVIORAL PRACTICES DEPRIVING OUR ECONOMY OF . . . 'VALUE' . . . MY FORECAST IS THAT THERE IS A DISTINCT POSSIBILITY THAT BY THE END OF THE YEAR, IF THINGS CONTINUE THE WAY THEY ARE GOING . . . OUR ECONOMY STANDS A GOOD CHANCE OF . . . IMPLOSION . . .

. . . HIRING PRACTICES ROBBING OUR NATIONAL ECONOMY AND THE GLOBAL ECONOMY OF ECONOMIC VALUE (VS. CAPITAL OUTLAY IN THE FORM OF PROMISSARY NOTES, DOLLARS) . . . CONTINUE TO ROB OUR CURRENCY OF LEGITIMATE VALUATION THROUGH THE GENERATION OF VALUE VIA LEGITIMATE HIRING PRACTICES . . . BRINGING THE MOST COMPETITIVE INTO THE LABOR MARKET AND PAYING THEM THEIR LEGITIMATE WORTH . . . TO DRIVE INCENTIVE . . . AND INCREASED VALUATION INTO THE ECONOMY FROM LABOR . . .

THE BI-PARTISAN POLITICS CONTINUES TO IGNORE WARNINGS THAT THE ECONOMY CANNOT WITHSTAND CONTINUED ROBBING OF VALUATION FROM THE ECONOMY DUE TO BI-PARTISAN AND SPECIAL INTEREST POLITICAL BEHAVIOR . . .

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WITH THE NATION'S LARGEST POPULATION, CONTINUES TO BE THE 'BLACK HOLE' OF THE ECONOMY . . . FAILING TO PARTICIPATE IN "TRANSLATIONAL ECONOMIC VALUATION FROM LABOR INTO THE OVERALL ECONOMY" . . . AS A RESULT OF POLITICALLY BASED, RATHER THAN COMPETITIVELY BASED, HIRING AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES . . .

THE POLITICAL BEHAVIOR CONTINUES TO SINK THE NATION AND THE GLOBAL ECONOMY'S EFFORTS TO "LEGITIMATELY RECOVER," ECONOMICALLY . . .

. . . NOT MERELY ON THE BASIS OF A "BUSINESS FINANCE" ANALYSIS, LARGELY DEVOID OF QUALITATIVE COMPETENCY, RELYING ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY ON QUANTITATIVE COMPETENCY, THE SAME PATH THAT BROUGHT OUR NATION AND THE GLOBAL ECONOMY TO ITS KNEES IN THE MANY YEARS LEADING UP TO THE ECONOMIC MELTDOWN OF 2008 . . ."
 
 

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

MODNEX INTEL/KATSURA WORLDWIDE: KATSURA, "LATEST FINDINGS FROM A PRODIGIOUS SAVANT"

MODNEX INTEL/KATSURA WORLDWIDE:  POWER NEWS ALERT - KATSURA, "MY LATEST FINDINGS ON LONGEVITY:  JAPANESE LIVE LONGER AS A RESULT OF NOT ONLY WHAT THEY EAT, BUT 'HOW' THEY EAT . . .  ALSO, TIPS TO LIFT THE ITALIAN RESTAURANT INDUSTRY IN CALIFORNIA"

As a prodigious savant, I've discovered why Italian food isn't competing as well as it used to in California: The pastas aren't served in bowls. It has come to my attention that spaghetti and linguine or wet stuffed pastas are served on plates where the diner must "chase around" the pasta on a flat plate. When served in bowls, as Asian food is, the pasta and toppings are contained so it's not so much work for the diner to enjoy the Italian food. The toppings are evenly distributed in a bowl, as well, as is the case when salads are served in bowls, too. As our population ages and eats out, they want to eat where it's not so much work to enjoy the food! Italian restaurants and other ethnic cuisines . . . do as the Japanese do, when preparing and serving your food. Remember, the tradition of the "flat plate" is becoming obsolete . . . as a relic of misguided European tradition, as are heavy utensils, as well . . . which will be obsolesced by the chopstick over time. Japanese lunch boxes and bowls will ultimately replaces plates, altogether over time . .
But, that's not all . . . as a prodigious savant, I've uncovered a dimension of epidemiological analysis which hasn't been covered in studies involving longevity and health: The Social Organization of Meal Preparation and Consuming. For example, Japan has developed a cultural custom of using lunch boxes which force them to fill in each box with something different. This diversifies nutritional ...intake and forces the diner to pick a small amount up with chopsticks, chew it a bit with saliva, and so on and so forth. The enzymes in the saliva mix with the smaller bites at a better proportional ratio than the way we consume, and the food is better broken down in the G.I. tract, as a result, leading to a more healthy G.I. tract and better immune system, as a result! It's not just WHAT the Japanese eat, it's literally HOW they eat it, as well . . . And, now you all know what the difference is between a prodigious savant in the social sciences, such as myself, and someone with perfect grades from the best schools. They're pretty good, typically. Ahhhhh, but when it comes to revolutionary thought and real change, they're just "technicians" to me, I'm afraid. (lol) Just teasing . . .

Continuing on yesterday's posts, you see, this is the thing, as a prodigious savant in the social behavioral sciences, this is what I've discovered. The "flat plate" is a cultural strategy for eating, and so are our typical utensils. But they are highly inefficient and misguided - this is why we have so many rules of irritating etiquette surrounding the use of them at the table - because they DON'T work that well. Hence, chopsticks and more use of better socially organization (technology of the bowl, the Japanese lunch box and chopsticks) and Asian approaches to eating will ultimately replace the flat plate and utensils on a daily basis.

Epidemiologically, the "flat plate" is a killer . . . The design encourages exactly what we do wrong at the dinner table today: Gobble large amounts of only a few entrees vs. consuming bite size amounts, mixing with saliva and then moving on to another item and repeating. Since we gobble, rather than "sample-pick eat," the amount of enzymes from saliva is vastly lower per swallow and food is chewed less per swallow creating havoc for our digestive systems, and therefore, our immune system, as well. This is largely a problem caused by the choice of employing the technology of the "flat plate," as its design alone encourages large amounts of a few entrees rather than smaller amounts of many items, as the Japanese lunch box technology encourages/culturally demands. Utensils vs. chopsticks - Chopstick technology encourages "pick/sample" eating, as well, and limits the size of the food item placed in the mouth, thus allowing for greater saliva/enzyme and chewing per swallow . . . as the diner considers the next item to "pick-sample" next . . . also giving the diner the opportunity to diversify what they are eating next, as well . . . Over the years, the Asian approach to eating saves massive amounts of damage caused to the G.I. tract/system and radically maintains the health and balance of the immune system which, in turn, greatly extends the life of the individual!

Please understand that pasta from Italy was handed down to Italy from China/Asia, to begin with. Pasta in noodle form was INTENDED to be eaten using chopstick technology, not the utensils we use to eat pasta noodles! Try going way, way back to what was intended for noodle pasta consumption: The chopstick and bowl. I think you’ll find that your linguine and clams or marinara w/meatballs over spaghetti will be much easier to consume (in particular if served Asian style in a bowl).  Live smarter, and live longer with greater health simply by changing the way you eat along with what you eat . . .
Chopsticks can be very “green,” as well, and also epidemiologically better than relying on steel/aluminum utensils, alone.  The energy we save from having to heat treat utensils in our restaurant industry can go far in savings.  I forecast that “chic, personalized, take with you” chopsticks will also come of age as a social trend, very soon . . .


You are all now privy to first hand research information which has yet to be published, just because you're all part of "GoKatsura2016" and "U.S. Advanced Independent Party" supporters . . .

Come see me at www.facebook.com/gokatsura2016 and see "the enlightened ones" enjoying Italian pasta using chopsticks . . .

WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/GOKATSURA2016
WWW.MYSPACE.COM/GOKATSURA2016
WWW.MYSPACE.COM/KENKATSURA

Saturday, February 4, 2012

MODNEX INTEL/KATSURA WORLDWIDE: KATSURA BLASTS GOVT. UNION HYPOCRISY, PAST U.S. “BADBOY/BADGIRL” ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL CULTURAL COMPLEX



MODNEX INTEL/KATSURA WORLDWIDE: KATSURA BLASTS GOVT. UNION HYPOCRISY, PAST U.S. “BADBOY/BADGIRL” ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL CULTURAL COMPLEX

KATSURA DECLARED:

"In CA if Fed/govt. employees, law enforcement, educators (active and retired) etc., believe that if individuals aren't paying enough into "the System," they have "no obligation" to approriately uphold the law or to provide quality govt. services to such individuals' - DESPITE SUCH INDIVIDUALS BEING "U.S. CITIZENS." Our govt. spends billions abroad on people for all manner of causes and THOSE PEOPLE don't pay a cent into our tax system or our higher educatioal financing system! What's up w/ the hypocrisy, folks! Do you also notice that U.S. citizens have LESS RIGHTS, in fact and practice, than folks from other nations working here?!  Notice that?  I have, to be certain!  Govt., you ARE OBLIGATED TO DO YOUR JOBS ON BEHALF OF U.S. CITIZENS. AT THIS TIME, I’D LIKE TO THANK THOSE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WHO ACTUALLY DO DEFY THE “BADBOYS/BADGIRLS” IN GOVT. UNIONS AND CARRY OUT THEIR DUTIES THOROUGHLY, WITH GREAT CONSCIENCE AND WITH CARE . . .

Can you imagine? Our govt. spends gazillions on folks abroad for congressional pet humanitarian and arts projects, and these folks pay absolutely nothing into our system. Those are worthy people apparently because THEY'RE NOT U.S. CITIZENS. If you're a U.S. citizen, the Feds view you as "bad, unworthy people," reagardless of what you've contributed to this nation . . .

How can we improve America? First we have to confront the REAL reason it's fallen from grace: The "Badboy" and "Badgirl" culture and complex. Face it, from top to bottom this is what's destroyed our nation. Our media and entertainment complex has got to stop generating this culture. Just because something sells well, doesn't mean it's okay, right? By the way, I'm not a conservative, I'm a "functionalist" critical thinker. I'm not a "conservative investor," either. I regard myself as a "critical" investor and believe that others should do the same.

Let's just face it everyone, the "Badboy" and "Badgirl" thing has merely exploited social concerns to be bad-boys and bad-girls, from top to bottom. Things haven't gotten better relative to all these so-called movements over the past 18 years, in fact, THEY'RE WORSE! Goldman Sachs has ONLY 6% FEMALE MANAGERS/EXECUTIVES after all the "Badgirl" destruction our nation has sufferened on behalf of supposed "women's equality/rights!" We could've achieved such gains for women, and more, by doing nothing! Can you imagine?

As it turns out, the OCCUPY movement, at it's core (not at the fringe), is a BACKLASH TO THE "BADBOY/BADGIRL" culture which has destroyed our nation and the global economy! OCCUPY is a necessary component of "legitimate change" in our nation. Americans are tired of the "badboy w/a badge," the "badgirl w/an attitude," the "badboy and badgirl w/a Bible," the "badboy/badgirl government leadership," the "badboy/badgirl" businesseperson/owner & employee, the "badboy/badgirl" entertainer, the "badboy/badgirl senior citizen," the "badboy/badgirl" disabled/mentally ill/veteran/recovering addict," etc.

This all needs to change . . . and I will be more than happy to lead the charge . . . as a potential presidential candidate for 2016 . . . "