Pages

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

MODNEX INTEL/KATSURA WORLDWIDE: KATSURA ON "PROOF REQUIREMENTS IN U.S."

MODNEX INTEL/KATSURA WORLDWIDE . . .

. . . "DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE" . . . "DIVISION OF SOCIAL JUSTICE" AND "DIVISION OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS" . . .

. . . REPORTS . . . IN A "POWER NEWS ALERT" . . .

. . . THAT . . . KEN KATSURA OF "GOKATSURA2016" . . . WWW.MYSPACE.COM/KENKATSURA . . .

. . . TOOK TIME OUT TO SHARE WITH AN "UNKNOWING AMERICA" . . . A FEW "WORDS OF WISDOM" . . . RELATIVE TO THE "SCAM OF THE REQUEST FOR PROOF" . . . THAT'S BEEN GOING AROUND THE U.S., CALIFORNIA . . .

KATSURA STATED:

"MANY OF YOU HAVE BEEN DUMBFOUNDED BY . . . EITHER GOVERNMENT, LAW, ADMINISTRATION . . . OR SIMPLY FOLKS WHO WANT TO CONFOUND YOU . . . WHEN YOU HAVE A MATTER OF NEED . . . AND THEY TURN YOU AWAY ON THE BASIS OF . . . 'REQUIREMENT OF PROOF' . . . IT INTIMIDATES YOU AND JUST LEAVES YOU HANGING, DOESN'T IT?  IT MAKES YOU BELIEVE THAT YOUR EXPERIENCE IS UNTRUE, YOUR CLAIM FALSE, ETC. . . . AND LEAVES YOU NOT BELIEVING IN YOURSELF.  WELL, AMERICANS WHO'VE BEEN LEFT THIS WAY . . . I'M HERE TODAY TO SHARE WITH YOU ALL . . . THAT IT'S NOTHING MORE THAN A 'SCAM' . . . TO 'GET YOU TO GIVE UP AND DISBELIEVE IN YOURSELVES' . . .

FIRST, WHEN PEOPLE ASK YOU FOR 'PROOF' . . . OR SAY THEY CANNOT DO SOMETHING FOR YOU . . . EVEN WHEN THINGS SEEM 'OBVIOUS' AND DON'T NEED 'PROOF' . . . BE AWARE . . . THAT THEY ARE OFTEN 'SCAMMING YOU INTO DISBELIEF IN YOURSELF' . . .

. . . WHEN THE TRUTH IS THAT YOU MAY HAVE A BONA FIDE CLAIM, YOUR TESTIMONY, REASONING . . . AND EVEN FOR SOME PROFESSIONALS . . . YOUR EXPERTISE . . . 'IS' . . . YOUR 'PROOF' . . . AND THEY ARE ESSENTIALLY ASKING YOU TO . . . FULFILL AN 'INAPPROPRIATE REQUIREMENT . . . TO YOUR 'PROVE YOUR PROOF' . . . KNOWING FULL WELL THIS WILL CONFOUND AND STUPIFY YOU . . . AND OFTEN GET YOU TO SURRENDER . . .

SECOND, I HAVE TO SHARE WITH YOU ALL . . . THAT AS A 'PROFESSIONAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE' . . .  THAT . . . 'PROOF' . . . IS ALMOST NEVER THE SAME IN ANY INDUSTRIES, SUCH AS LAW, SOCIOLOGY, PSYCHOLOGY, HARD SCIENCES, ETC.!

YOU OFTEN MISGUIDEDLY 'TRUST' THE 'LAW' . . . AS THE 'STANDARD' FOR 'UNIVERSAL PROOF' . . . DON'T YOU?  YOU'RE MISGUIDED . . .

THERE IS 'NO STANDARD' . . . BUT RATHER A 'REQUIREMENT' OF PROOF IN LAW . . . THE LAW . . . NOT THE ALL-KNOWING BODY OF INTELLECTUAL AUTHORITY OF 'PROOF'.  IN FACT, THE SO-CALLED 'STANDARDS OF PROOF' IN LAW . . . CHANGE . . . OFTEN ENOUGH . . . SO THAT USING THE TERM 'STANDARD' OF PROOF . . . IS A MISLEADING TERM . . .

IN LAW . . . 'REQUIREMENTS OF PROOF' . . . VARY!  FROM DIFFERING REQUIREMENTS FOR PROOF IN CRIMINAL TO CIVIL MATTERS, TO INTERNATIONAL, FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL DIFFERENCES . . . THE DEFINITION OF 'PROOF' . . . VARIES!  FURTHRMORE, DEPENDING ON THE ISSUE AT HAND, THE DEFINITION OF 'PROOF' IN LAW CAN VARY EVEN FURTHER!

IN SHORT, WITHIN LAW . . . THERE IS NO SINGLE 'STANDARD OF PROOF' OR 'DEFINITION OF PROOF' . . . AND IT CHANGES OFTEN, AS WELL . . .

FINALLY, PLEASE BE AWARE THAT . . . IN LAW . . . 'PROOF' IS 'DERIVED FROM LEGISLATION WHOSE DEVELOPMENT FROM BILL TO LAW . . . WAS INFLUENCED BY LOBBYISTS WITH ULTERIOR MOTIVES' . . . OFTEN PRODUCING A LAW WHICH REQUIRES 'PROOF' WHICH IS VIRTUALLY 'UNATTAINABLE' BY 'REASONABLE MAN' STANDARDS . . .

. . . THE LEGISLATION DESIGNED THIS WAY TO 'PREJUDICE IN FAVOR OF' . . . AND 'PREJUDICE AGAINST' . . . SAY . . . CLAIMANTS OF INSURANCE, ADMINISTRATION, ETC.

. . . GOD ONLY KNOWS . . . WHAT 'PROOF' MEANS . . . IN THE FIELD OF LAW . . . OR HOW CLOSELY IT MAY RESEMBLE . . . BONA FIDE 'PROOF' OF ANYTHING . . .RELATIVE TO 'SOCIAL REALITY' . . . OR 'COMMON SENSE' . . . AS WE CAN SEE . . . FROM THE IMPACT OF OTHER FORMS OF LEGISLATION . . . WHICH OFTEN DO NOT BEAR ANY RESEMBLANCE TO BEING 'IN TOUCH WITH SOCIAL REALITY', AS WELL . . .

SO, DON'T ALLOW PEOPLE TO INTIMIDATE YOU WITH, "HEY, I NEED PROOF!" . . . AS IF 'PROOF' . . . IS SOMETHING WHICH IS 'UNIVERSAL' . . . WHEN 'PROOF' . . . IF FAR, FAR, FAR . . . FROM BEING ANYTHING . . . UNIVERSAL . . .

ALONG THE LINES OF VARIOUS INDUSTRIES OF SCALES, WE ALL HAVE OUR DIFFERING FORMS OF 'PROOF' . . . SOCIOLOGICAL STANDARDS OF PROOF, MATHEMATICAL STANDARDS OF PROOF, MEDICAL STANDARDS OF PROOF, STANDARDS OF PROOF IN PHYSICS, STANDARDS OF PROOF IN PSYCHOLOGY . . . CAN ALL BE  . . . 'DIFFERENT.'

SO, BE AWARE . . . THAT . . . IN PARTICULAR . . . WHEN FOLKS ASK YOU FOR 'PROOF' . . . YOU RESPOND BY SAYING . . . 'BY WHOSE STANDARDS OF PROOF AND IF YOU COULD PLEASE DEFINE WHAT YOU MEAN, SPECIFICALLY BY PROOF, THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL' . . .

NOTE, HERE, ALSO . . . THAT . . . 'PROOF' IN LAW . . . DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN 'TRUTH' . . . OR 'FALSITY' . . . FOR THE REASONS NOTED ABOVE.  THIS IS IMPORTANT.  I RECALL THE CASE WHERE A MAN WAS WRONGLY CONVICTED OF RAPE AND SERVED 25 YRS. IN JAIL, ONLY TO BE RELEASED AS A RESULT OF DNA TESTING!  CLEARLY, THE LAW'S SO-CALLED 'STANDARD OF PROOF' . . . WAS VASTLY INSUFFICIENT . . . TO DETERMINE THE TRUTH OR FALSITY OF THE DEFENDANT'S CLAIM OF INNOCENCE, WASN'T IT? 

SO, BE CAREFUL ABOUT 'PROOF' . . . PROVIDED BY THE LEGAL COMMUNITY . . . KNOW HOW IT WAS DERIVED (OFTEN VIA LEGISLATIVE SHENNANIGANS) AND HOW IT IS USED AS 'FACT' . . . IN . . . 'POLITICAL SALESMANSHIP' . . . BY FOLKS

WANT TO HEAR SOMETHING INTERESTING?  A JUDGE DISAGREED WITH ME ON THIS AND STATED THAT THE LAW IS THE 'STANDARD OF PROOF' FOR SOCIETY.  SO, I ASKED HIM HOW HE KNEW THAT THE LAW 'WAS WORKING.'  I SAID, 'YOUR HONOR, HOW DO YOU KNOW WHETHER THE LAW IS ACTUALLY WORKING?'  HE REPLIED THAT THIS THAT AND THE OTHER . . . RELATIVE TO STATISTICAL DATA . . . SHOWS THAT IT WORKS, TO WHICH I REPLIED . . . 'YES, BUT THAT DATA IS BASED UPON 'PROFESSIONAL SOCIOLOGICAL PROOF AND METHOD, NOT LEGAL METHOD OR STANDARDS OF PROOF.  SO, YOUR HONOR, YOU MEAN TO TELL ME THAT THE ONLY WAY YOU KNOW THAT THE LAW IS WORKING IS BY METHOD AND PROOF WHICH ISN'T DERIVED FROM THE LAW, ITSELF?"  THE JUDGE RESPONDED, "WHY, I SUPPOSE I DO . . ."

SO, THE JUDGE HAD TO ADMIT . . . THAT THE LAW . . . WAS NOT EMPLOYING THE HIGHEST AND MOST UNIVERSAL STANDARDS OF METHOD AND PROOF TO DETERMINE . . . LEGITIMACY OR REALITY OR . . . TRUTH . . . FROM FALSITY . . .

. . . REMEMBER WHAT HAS BEEN SHARED WITH YOU THIS EVENING, AMERICA . . . AND REMEMBER THAT . . . LEGAL PROOF . . . IS NOT . . . PROOF UNIVERSALLY . . . NOR TRUTH UNIVERSALLY . . . NOR SHOULD IT BE EXPECTED TO BE . . . UNIVERSAL TRUTH OR METHODOLOGICALLY EMPLOYED IN OTHER AREAS OF EXPERTISE . . ."

No comments:

Post a Comment