"DIVISION OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND CIVIL RIGHTS REFORM" . . . AND "DIVISION OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE" . . .
. . . REPORTS . . . IN A "BREAKING NEWS ALERT" . . .
. . . THAT SOCIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC PRODIGIOUS SAVANT, "KEN KATSURA" . . . ADDS A NEW DIMENSION TO SOCIAL JUSTICE AND RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ANALYSIS IN THE UNITED STATES . . . WHICH HE STATES WILL ALLOW FOR THE HIRING OF THE MOST PRODUCTIVE AND TALENTED, REGARDLESS OR RACE, TO ENSURE THAT PROFITS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH WILL BLOOM . . . AND AT THE SAME TIME SOCIAL JUSTICE WILL PREVAIL . . .
KATSURA
STATED:
“THE
PROBLEM IN CALIFORNIA, AND PERHAPS IN OTHER PARTS OF THE U.S., AS WELL, IS THAT
. . . SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS IN CALIFORNIA ARE NOTHING MORE THAN POLITICAL
VEHICLES OF . . . 'CRONY RACISM' . . . WITH THE 'WOMENS MOVEMENT' AND SO-CALLED
'NATIVE AMERICAN' AND 'ETHNIC MINORITY' AND 'EQUALITY' AND 'BOTTOM-UP LABOR'
MOVEMENTS AT THE TOP OF THE LIST OF MOVEMENTS WHICH, ULTIMATELY, TURN OUT TO BE
MOVEMENTS OF 'CRONY RACISM' AND ‘WHITE RETRENCHMENT’ IN CALIFORNIA . . .
IN
GRADUATE SCHOOL, BACK IN 1991-92, MY POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHY PROFESSOR HAD
ALL THE DATA ABOUT ETHNIC MINORITIES AND NON-WHITES BECOMING THE MAJORITY
POPULATION IN CALIFORNIA. SO, THE FACT
IS, THAT GOVERNMENT AND BUSINESS LEADERS WERE WELL AWARE OF THIS COMING CHANGE,
WHICH HAS ALREADY ARRIVED, AS FAR BACK AS IN THE LATE 1980S/EARLY 1990s. THE ‘NEW DEMOCRATS’ CAME INTO POWER IN
1993. THE ‘NEW REPUBLICANS’ FOLLOWED . .
. BOTH SUBSCRIBED TO ‘WHITE RETRENCHMENT’
TACTICS USING SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS AND A PHONY MULTICULTURAL MOVEMENT TO
ETHNICIZE AND COLORIZE NON-WHITES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE AND TO THE
INTENDED POINT OF SOCIAL STIGMA, ALIENTATING NON-WHITES FROM THEIR
IDENTIFICATION OF BEING ‘AMERICANS.’ . . .
THE STRATEGY ALSO DIVIDED NON-WHITES INTO SEPARATE AND DISTINCT GROUPS
AND GROUP IDENTIFICATION, A CRONY ‘DIVIDE AND CONQUER’ STRATEGY, TO BE CERTAIN
. . .
The
problem is that government lumps both 'ethnic minorities' and 'non-whites'
together into categories of RACE, rather than WHITE, PART-WHITE and NON-WHITE.
If government did this it would clearly reveal the 'Soft/Passive Apartheid'
which has existed and continues to exist . . . UNABATED AND ON A ‘CRONY’ LEVEL.
ALMOST
EVERYONE IS AN ‘ETHNIC MINORITY’ IN CALIFORNIA AND SO-CALLED 'ETHNIC MINORITIES'
ARE NOT TRUE 'MINORITIES', AS A GROUP, BUT A ‘MAJORITY’ IN FACT. ‘ETHNIC MINORITIES’ CAN BE PERSONS WHO ARE
MERELY A FACTION ‘NON-WHITE,’ BUT FAR, FAR FROM APPEARING ‘NON-WHITE.’ ONLY 'NON-WHITES' ARE . . . TRUE ‘MINORITIES’
. . . WE NEED TO CHANGE THIS. ‘NON-WHITES’ HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO RACIAL
RELATIONSHIP WITH ‘WHITES’ . . . WHILE SO-CALLED ‘ETHNIC MINORITIES’ CAN, AND
UP TO INCLUDING BEING, LITERALLY, ALMOST FULLY WHITE. THE CONCENTRATION OF OUR EFFORTS TO ENSURE
THAT ‘ETHNIC MINORITY RIGHTS’ ARE THE CENTER OF OUR EFFORTS TO COMBAT AGAINST
RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ARE . . . ‘WHOLLY MISGUIDED.’
The fact that so many U.S. Whites are part Siberian
(American Indian) makes their claim to ethnic minority status moot. One also
has to realize that almost by default, Scandinavian Americans (Swede, Norwegian
and Finnish, but not Danish) are half/fraction breeds by default as a result of
these nations peoples HAVING INDIAN POPULATIONS such as the Sammi, Lapp and
Kvet. There tons of peoples in these Scandinavian nations who are white, blond
and blue eyed wno are part Lapp, Kvet, etc. SUCH PEOPLE COMPRISE A LARGE
PERCENTAGE OF THE U.S. POPULATION OF WHITES. So, virtually by default most U.S.
Whites aren't completely white and are at least part Indian, either from
Scandinavia or Siberia/the Americas. Since this is the case, whites in the U.S.
being a fraction Indian is moot and only AFFIRMS NON-MINORITY STATUS IN THE
U.S.
(NOTE: The probability that Swedish,
Finnish and Norwegian Americans are part Indian (Sammi, Lapp, Kvet,
etc., is very high . . . and such ancestries comprise a large percentage of the U.S. white population and white-ethnic minority population, as well.)
Govt
should, first and foremost ask 'Are you a WHITE, PART-WHITE or NON-WHITE
individual?' This prevents individuals and groups from exploiting trace
non-white genetic elements in their makeup to excuse themselves from liability
or suspicion of discrimination against non-whites! THE FOCUS ON WHO IS AND IS NOT AN ‘ETHNIC
MINORITY,’ RATHER THAN ‘WHITE,’ ‘PART WHITE’ OR ‘NON-WHITE’ . . . IS ESSENTIALLY
HOW CALIFORNIA GETS AWAY WITH 'SOFT/PASSIVE APARTHEID' . . . AND MAINTAINS A
LARGELY RACIALLY-BASED CASTE SYSTEM OF OPPORTUNITY . . . AND PREDICATED ON HOW
'WHITE' YOU ARE . . . WITH 'NON-WHITES' AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF CALIFORNIA'S
RACIAL CASTE SYSTEM . . . ‘ETHNIC MINORITIES’ NEXT UP THE LADDER, AND ‘WHITES’
AND ‘NEAR WHITES’ AT THE VERY TOP. THE
LESS ‘WHITE’ YOU ARE, THE LESS CREDIT AND RECOGNITION YOU RECIEVE FOR YOUR
ACHIEVEMENTS AND CIVIC CHARACTER . . .”
(I am a
NON-WHITE bearing superior qualifications .
. . while, UNFORTUNATELY, AS A RESULT OF THE PAST ERAS SUCCEEDING THE 1980s, . . . NONE of my past employers/managers/supervisors are NON-WHITES.)
No comments:
Post a Comment